4K vs 2K resolution comparison side by side – Fitness Edition



4K vs 2K resolution comparison side by side so you can see the difference between the 2 resolutions. You must view this on a 4K monitor to be able to fully see the difference in the quality. I’m showing this because I am now using my 4K camera Sony FDR-AX100 to film most of the videos I now post on you tube.

Music used:
1) Streets of the Unknown by Machinimasound.com

.

You may also like...

43 Responses

  1. GDTRFBBB says:

    I see No difference at all. . Depending on focus at any instant, either side can look a tiny bit better or worse

  2. RAP BARS….I CALL MY DICK….4K….I FUCK….4 OK….ON THE….FLOOR OK….I GET….MORE WHORES OK….MY DICK….MIGHT BE….TRANSEXUAL….ALL I GET IS….FEMALE WHORE MOANS….MY RAP BARS ARE COLORFUL….I AM GOING….RAINBOW FLAG LGBT….WITH THIS….I CALL MY GUN….A TRANSEXUAL….I TURN….NIGGAS TO BITCHES….WHILE IM….FINGER FUCKING….THEIR ASS….I TRIGGER SHIT OFF….FUCKING WITH ME….I TAKE YOUR GIRL….SHE SUCKING WITH ME….I CUM ON HER FACE….NOW SHE STICKING WITH ME

  3. I hate weebs says:

    Man the 1 one is the grossest and fakest thing ever, but the second one man she's HOOOT

  4. I was looking at them chicks and I completely forgot about comparing the resolution

  5. Carl Siemens says:

    Finally, a video that doesn't misuse "2K" to mean QHD.

  6. NOBODY says:

    1920 x 1080 IS NOT 2k, WTF is wrong with people. 2k is 2560 x 1440.

  7. all the resolution in the world wont change the fact that these girls lack the proper ASSpect ratio. the little energetic one is cute though she could use a good meal or 12. at least she looks more natural, unlike mangina, meadow soprano meets jessica rabbit, or the postergirl for future melanoma.

  8. Aniki says:

    lo siento no prete atension a la diferencia del 4k y hD😄😍😍😍😍😍😍😍😍😍

  9. cyigen85 says:

    These bitches are ugly, they all look used

  10. vibr031 says:

    damn i cant concentrate to see the difference of 2k and 4k

  11. Andy Mcnally says:

    Hmmmm don't think this video was recorded with a device that is capable of capturing sufficient detail.

    Usign my IGZO IPS 4k monitor I could only see subtle differences in the hair. 1080p is still damn good especially when viewing from distance.

  12. 1080p is now 1440p, ok. Thanks, learned something new today!

  13. Mr.Jason says:

    this is 1k compared to 4k… 2k = 2560 x 1440 fyi

  14. boggiewan says:

    In all honesty, this resolution increase is starting to show diminishing returns. The only places where it does shine is with purely generated/CG content since everything becomes smoother. When we'll be having the 4k to 8k resolution, this argument will only become even more relevant.

  15. mj dez says:

    i rather have 720p at 60 fps than ridiculously high res at measly 30fps with the judder (choppy motion) annoying my eyes

  16. Tzuno says:

    Who cares about resolutions on this video, god damn hot women.

  17. Who gives a fuck about the resolution when there's all kinds of tender ass all over the place 😉

  18. i just forgert the resolution :C why am i whaching this xd?

  19. yam316 says:

    2k is not 1080p is 1440p

  20. Paufit says:

    There’s debate about whether 4K is even worth it. To measure the impact on the audience – whether it’s an 84-inch ultra HDTV or a 98-foot IMAX screen – the industry looks at the height of the screen relative to the distance from the viewer. The rule of thumb is that 4K is noticeable if one is sitting from a distance 1.5-times the screen height or closer. That’s typically the first few rows of a movie theater.

    Read more: http://www.digitaltrends.com/photography/4k-is-already-playing-at-a-theater-near-you-but-you-probably-didnt-even-notice/#ixzz3Qh2RSKwX 
    Follow us:@digitaltrends on Twitter | digitaltrendsftw on Facebook

  21. Mokredit says:

    sorry but 1080p isnt 2k its 1k

  22. pongespob says:

    Yes their tits look a lot less fake in 4k.

  23. Sooooo, when does the first 4K lesbian porno get released?

  24. MrDarkCopper says:

    And that on a 1920×1080 Screen 😀

  25. Q36BN says:

    I know it's not a proper video to write such comments, but i can't help it.

    It's not 4K vs 2K.
    It's UHD vs FHD or 2160p vs 1080p.
    or if you really want to use "4k" it should be "4K UHD"

    xK names comes from cinema, and stands for horizontal resolution.
    "2K" is usually 2048×1080,
    "4K" is usually 4096×2160.

    2K and 4K names should have never been used when thinking about (U)HDTVs.
    The marketers ruined all the well established naming standards.
    Now, everybody wants 4k, and everybody starts to say they have 2K, even though they don't have true 2K, or even 4K resolution.
    Only a couple of TVs that are/were available for purchase use 4096×2160 resolution.

    The majority of 4K tv are actually 3840×2160 i.e UHD, or Ultra HD if you prefer.

  26. theslk28 says:

    Awesome track 0:51 min hottest one 🙂 

  27. Ryan Lynas says:

    Who's the second girl number 16

  28. Stu Brown says:

    Very nice example. Next time can you please take the line out of the middle? (Just kidding)

  29. 0utlawjase1 says:

    There smiles look so real god bless them ,

  30. lovesgibson says:

    Cant see a difference on iphone 4s. Half way through the vid i forgot i was looking for differences

  31. Adrian says:

    fuck they r so hot tho :O

  32. shiningcross says:

    Big brah… reso comparisons only work when you have a video resolution higher than any of the ones shown.

Leave a Reply